[sugar] [IAEP] Sugar on Ubuntu - Summary

[David Van Assche]

I think the fact no source code is available might cause a problem for
it getting into Main... thats not necessarily such a bad thing though.
Edubuntu addon packages will definitely go to universe, its just a
question of when. The only difference is, no direct downstream
support. But as I understand it this support will come from mostly
upstream anyway, and there are a couple of ubuntu devs on upstream
anyway.

Or am I missing something, is there some reason we absolutely must
have Canonical support for squeak?

David

On 11/7/08, Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  additionaly to what Bert said:
>
>  to summarize _my understanding_ again: there is source, there is just no ascii
>  representation of the source / you cannot compile the source to binaries.
>  Because the source comes as blobs (being the VM in it's state), which can be
>  edited inside the virtual machine it represents.
>
>  In theory squeak can be bootstrapped, in practice not.
>
>  (Hence, there is a chicken and egg problem. (For non squeak developers. Squeak
>  developers are used to this and happy about it.))
>
>
>  regards,
>
>         Holger
>
> _______________________________________________
>  IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>  IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>