[sugar] sugar 0.83 in joyride

[Ed McNierney]

This certainly seems like a reasonable solution.

	- Ed

On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> Hi again, I'm thinking that perhaps best would be to create a
>> joyride branch similar to faster that sugar developers could
>> administer by ourselves.
>
>> In that way we wouldn't be blocking on each other so often and
>> Sugar developers could more easily adapt Sugar to the OLPC
>> hardware.
>
> I'm fine with giving commit access to pilgrim/joyride to any Sugar
> developers who want it.  Shall we just do that instead?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
> -- 
> Chris Ball   <cjb at laptop.org>