[sugar] Patch to make Browse annoy me less.

Eben Eliason eben.eliason at gmail.com
Mon May 19 12:30:33 EDT 2008


Just a high level take on these patches...

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Cortland Setlow
<cortland.setlow at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch does three things, and I'll be happy if even one makes it in to
> Browse.
>
> It causes ctrl-l (lowercase L) to put focus on the address bar like in all
> other browsers that do not make me angry.

Sounds good to me.  Adherence to well known shortcuts is usually a
win, and this is a basic feature we didn't have before, as far as I
know.  I suppose the mnemonic is "location".

> It causes ctrl-d to do what ctrl-l used to do, namely do a
> screenshot-bookmark.  This is the standard bookmark key.   Pressing ctrl-d
> more times will show/hide the bookmark toolbar, so if you accidentally show
> it you can get rid of the large and obnoxious thing.  Ctrl-b will also
> show/hide it, cause why not?

Anyone care to explain the mnemonic for Ctrl-d?  Again, keeping to the
standards can't really be a bad thing.  I'm unsure about overloading
the shortcut with the bar toggle, though.  I might instead offer that
alt-ctrl-d could make be added for making a bookmark "silently"
(without revealing the tray, if it's hidden).  I think it's better to
keep the notion of creating a bookmark and toggling the bookmark tray
independent.  In my browser, command-shift-B toggles the bookmark bar,
but I can't see a reason to require the extra shift modifier (is that
a standard elsewhere?).  The shortcut for this is currently
ctrl-space, I think...if we make ctrl-b serve this purpose we should
remove the other shortcut.

> It causes ctrl-i to show the URI of the page instead of the title,
> temporarily.  Good for checking that one isn't being fished.

This is a pretty interesting idea, and a very nice addition to the
concept of the combined URL/address bar.  If you're up to it, I would
appreciate it if you could try out another related idea which I've
been thinking about.  I think it would also make sense to reveal the
URI whenever the cursor is within the entry, so that it's possible to
select all or part of it, or position the cursor in a meaningful way
when clicking into it.

I think that we could certainly make use of most of this with the
changes/additions described above!  Thanks for your efforts!

- Eben


More information about the Sugar mailing list