[sugar] On the Naming of Sugar
Marco Pesenti Gritti
mpgritti at gmail.com
Sat May 17 16:52:36 EDT 2008
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Sort of. Mostly, I'm not sure I understand your intended release
> timeline, so I didn't want to touch it.
>
> I think s/Sugar/Sucrose/ is probably a good choice here. However, I also
> view a Sucrose release as little more than a pair of pointers, to a
> specific version of Glucose and a specific version of Fructose. So for
> example, declaring a "feature freeze" on Sucrose seems slightly weird,
> because Sucrose doesn't really have any features of its own. This is not
> an important point, but since I was not 100% sure what to do, I did nothing.
For 0.82, I'm planning to use a single schedule for Glucose/Fructose
for simplicity (we can reevalute for the next release). So I think
using Fructose on the schedule make sense. I went ahead and made the
change.
Marco
More information about the Sugar
mailing list