[sugar] [PATCH] Add speaker device and icon by default
Eben Eliason
eben.eliason at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 12:47:11 EDT 2008
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Martin Dengler
<martin at martindengler.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:01:52PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> > I'll /try/ to keep my comments mostly to the UI and leave the code
> > review for others. I'll also fail at that to some extent, since I
> > have curiosities about bits and pieces.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Martin Dengler
> > <martin at martindengler.com> wrote:
> >
> > > + return self._master.flags & gst.interfaces.MIXER_TRACK_MUTE \
> > > + == gst.interfaces.MIXER_TRACK_MUTE
> >
> > If MIXER_TRACK_MUTE is a bit mask, isn't the equality check redundant?
>
> It's not a bitmask, IIUC. So no, it's not redundant AFAICS. But yes,
> it'd read much more nicely without the equality check if it wasn't.
Hmmm, but you appear to be using it as such anyway. How else could
the boolean & be interpreted logically otherwise? (I may very well be
missing something here.) It was pointed out to me that one reason for
it would be to return a boolean type, instead of an int, which is a
valid assessment (I'm too familiar with C....). If that's the core
reason, however, I might find simply casting to bool clearer.
> > Let's use the dialog-ok and dialog-cancel icons for now, which will
> > match the current mockups for the mic and camera. We can change them
> > easily later if we need to.
>
> dialog-ok to go with the "Unmute" text, and -cancel to go with "Mute"?
Yup.
> > > + mute_item_text += '...'
> >
> > This is a bad habit that everyone seems to get into. Cut this line.
>
> Sorry! I know the rule(s) you cite, and must blame lack of sleep for
> leaving this in. I was cargo-culting "Disconnect..." from
> network/wireless.py, I think.
Good! I expect not to have to slap you again for this. :-P
- Eben
More information about the Sugar
mailing list