[sugar] First impressions of a B4 machine
J.M. Maurer
uwog at uwog.net
Mon Jul 23 15:58:13 EDT 2007
> Next is AbiWord. Why was it not stripped of support for most file
> formats? Microsoft Word .doc is proprietary and should be removed,
> not to mention it's useless for children using XO -- none of their
> classmates or teachers will be using Microsoft Word.
> AbiWord's own format should be removed because its useless for interoperability
It is _required_ for collaboration, so it can't even technically be
removed.
> and ODT does a fine job by itself.
... that's why has been the default for 2 months now.
> RTF? Who uses RTF these days?
The whole web is filled with it.
> This is all bloat and has no point for the children.
I tend disagree.
> OpenDocument should be the default format for saving new documents and
> open older ones.
It already is
> HTML support makes sense if children will put stuff on the Web, and if
> so, HTML should be kept in its simple form, no Multipart HTML crap,
> which doesn't even work on XULRunner, anyway. Plain text support is
> always a good idea, after all, Linux is all about editing text files
> :) However, I have no idea what "Encoded Text" is.
That's why encoded text is not in the UI.
> Other character sets besides ANSI? Useless. It only confuses the children.
Agreed, see above.
> Appropriate handling of character encodings should not force seperate
> text formats. Actually it's not even a problem anymore with Unicode
> around.
>
> If it could export PDF as OpenOffice does then Abi would become quite
> useful. That's not the case, right now. I heard there's an
> unofficial plugin to do this. Maybe worth looking at?
No need fo unofficial plugin: AbiWord core can already save PDF's, but currently printing support is disabled altogether. We require libgnomeprint for PDF output. I'm willing to enable this if the need arises.
Regards,
Marc
More information about the Sugar
mailing list