[Server-devel] [XSCE] [RFC] XSCE 6.0 test matrix

[Tim Moody]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xsce-devel at googlegroups.com [mailto:xsce-
> devel at googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Vonau
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 12:24 PM
> To: Anish Mangal <anishmg at umich.edu>; xsce-devel at googlegroups.com
> Cc: server-devel <server-devel at lists.laptop.org>
> Subject: Re: [XSCE] [RFC] XSCE 6.0 test matrix
> 
> 
> 
> > On November 15, 2015 at 10:27 AM Anish Mangal <anishmg at umich.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Tim Moody <tim at timmoody.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > What does install mode mean? (gateway, appliance, nw controller?)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Yes
> >
> 
> Should we add a starting point as in pre-packaged image, older vm, fresh vm,
> fresh stock net/livecd install, or my kickstart assisted install? Did I
> miss any flavors of starting points?

I think the whole question of test methodology has not yet been addressed, but this is certainly an aspect of it.

> 
> >
> > > I added Number Eth adapters and other HW info
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Great. I was actually thinking whether we should have different rows
> > for all such info, or just a link to /etc/xsce.ini. Maybe it makes
> > sense to have them in separate rows just in case the info in
> > /etc/xsce,ini may be stale?
> >
> >
> > > what do L0 and L1 mean?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This is a remnant of my semiconductor h/w verification days. Wanted to
> > have a basic distinction between depth of testing. So in this case, L0
> > would mean basic testing of the most critical stuff. L1 means deeper
> > level testing. The idea being an L0 test run would be over much
> > quicker and L1 take additional time (and maybe expertise) so not
> > everybody might want to do it.
> 
> I like the idea. Just to clarify, are you thinking if the correct result appears in
> L0 there should be no need to move to L1's more detailed debugging?
> 
> Jerry