[Server-devel] [XSCE] XSCE/xsce and activitycetral/dxs repository integration in a branch preserving history

Anish Mangal anish at activitycentral.com
Wed Oct 23 16:30:10 EDT 2013


Maybe "git rebase --interactive <commit>" will fix it without much headache
for you


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Tim Moody <tim at timmoody.com> wrote:

>   my branch will be one commit behind, the commit of the merge of dxs
> into master
>
> Tim
>
>  *From:* Anish Mangal <anish at activitycentral.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:17 PM
> *To:* xsce-devel <xsce-devel at googlegroups.com>
> *Cc:* server-devel <server-devel at lists.laptop.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [XSCE] XSCE/xsce and activitycetral/dxs repository
> integration in a branch preserving history
>
>  There should be none. There might be a 100 commits (the dxs history)
> instead of the current 1 commit, but the end result of those 100 will be
> the same.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Tim Moody <tim at timmoody.com> wrote:
>
>>   >Exactly! I also think it is a risk to have "development" being done
>> in xsce:dxs. I would be in favor of just creating a xsce:dxs with all the
>> dxs commits, so we don't lose the history, and then we just merge that to
>> the xsce:master branch and just continue working there.
>> >
>> >WhatSay?
>>
>> OK, but what happens to the development I or anyone else has been doing
>> in a branch off the fork of the current xsce when we do a PR?  I think
>> there will be conflicts.
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/attachments/20131023/e6efd8bf/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Server-devel mailing list