[Server-devel] [XSCE] Re: XSCE Proposal | Moving to github and notifications

Jerry Vonau jvonau at shaw.ca
Sun Oct 13 18:27:55 EDT 2013


On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 18:20 -0400, Tim Moody wrote:
> +1 for the move.  I guess you need to be careful with the timing so
> you don’t end up with the repo offline during the sprint, but if you
> feel confident in that then go for it.
>  

+1 motion carried, lets proceed. Now the question is working with merge
requests, how are we going to handle that?

Jerry

> _______________________________________________
> Change of Address
> 
> timmoody at sympatico.ca is now tim at timmoody.com
> 
> Please change your bookmarks. Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> 
>  
> From: Anish Mangal 
> Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:11 PM
> To: Martin Dluhos ; xsce-devel 
> Cc: server-devel 
> Subject: [XSCE] Re: [Server-devel] XSCE Proposal | Moving to github
> and notifications
>  
> *If* there is consensus on moving to github, should be think about
> making the switch before the hacksprint in SF? It might save us some
> time as then we would have set-up the buildbot, etc.  
>  
> On the other hand, if there isn't consensus, maybe the hacksprint
> would be a good opportunity to try github out. 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Martin Dluhos <martin at gnu.org> wrote:
>         On 10/09/2013 11:13 AM, Anish Mangal wrote:
>         >> I think that it would be more appropriate to send
>         notifications of merged pull
>         >> > requests rather than individual commits to avoid too much
>         noise on the channel.
>         >> > Those who are interested can always follow the pull
>         request link to access
>         >> > individual commits.
>         >> >
>         > I would prefer notifications for pull requests *both* when
>         they are
>         > created and when they are merged. The creation of the pull
>         request
>         > will sort of open a review and test window for people
>         willing to do
>         > that, so notifying that event is necessary IMO.
>         
>         
>         Very good point. I agree.
>         _______________________________________________
>         Server-devel mailing list
>         Server-devel at lists.laptop.org
>         http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
>         
>  




More information about the Server-devel mailing list