[Server-devel] Notes on service discovery XS/XO
pgf at laptop.org
pgf at laptop.org
Mon Apr 20 09:45:28 EDT 2009
benjamin m. schwartz wrote:
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > The short of it is that mdns/dns-sd make sense for a small,
> > underutilised network of peers. They assume that the network is a
> > cheap resource, that broadcast messages are cheap, and that there is
> > no coordinating server.
>
> mDNS assumes all of the above things. DNS-SD does not. DNS-SD is
> perfectly happy to work on a standard DNS server. From the spec
>
> """
> This document proposes no change to the structure of DNS messages,
> and no new operation codes, response codes, resource record types,
> or any other new DNS protocol values. This document simply specifies
> a convention for how existing resource record types can be named and
> structured to facilitate service discovery.
> """
> (http://files.dns-sd.org/draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd.txt)
the last i looked at (and actually used) dns-sd to solve the
discovery problem, it seemed that dns-sd development had stalled.
(and i haven't had a reason to look since.) i believe we used
code from Sun, which was all i could find at the time, and it
wasn't what you'd call production ready. on the other hand, we
were using it in a somewhat non-standard way -- in fact, we
switched to mdns soon after because it fit our deployment model
better, since we didn't really have a central server. the XS
model may be a better fit.
(this was all 3 or 4 years ago, btw.)
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Server-devel
mailing list