[Server-devel] iso size

Jerry Vonau jvonau at shaw.ca
Mon Nov 17 15:14:26 EST 2008


Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jerry Vonau <jvonau at shaw.ca> wrote:
>> Well, the upgrade is not painful. The weird thing I found is about yum,
>> $releasever, and fedora-updates.repo, we have two issues..
>>
>> First with the use of xs-release  when I do a "rpm -q --whatprovides
>> /etc/fedora-release" I get back:
>> fedora-release-7-3.noarch
>> xs-release-9-0.4.12.noarch
>> which will confuse the heck out of yum if you have $releasever anywhere.
>>
>> I guess we should have xs-release do:
>> Obsoletes: fedora-release
> 
> Ah, that only happens on an update, correct?
> 
Yes.

>> Second, I found the above because I did a "yum repolist" and the
>> fedora-update repo from the F7 install was active. Need to remove that one,
>> maybe from xs-release?
> 
> Well, it's gone from xs-release -- why does it show up as active?
> Maybe we have to recommend a manual step, but what would that be?
> 
It's from fedora-release, and was used for the normal updates repo, 
until the "key issue" came into being. xs-release will need to follow 
what ever fedora-release does, my guess is to rename/disable that repo 
file. I'm pretty sure fedora-release will change back to the prior 
layout post F9. Might want to check the layout of a F10 fedora-release.

Jerry


More information about the Server-devel mailing list