[Server-devel] XS 0.5 upgrade notes
Greg Smith
gregsmitholpc at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 12:27:39 EST 2008
Hi Douglas and Martin,
Good info!
As Martin says, can we put that in the release notes?
Also on release notes, I was poking around in GIT and came across a
bunch of very useful looking Readme files. Can we copy those in to the
release notes (or maybe link to them in GIT if they will stay the same)?
I think that's all the documentation we will need for most features.
Let me know how I can help with the mechanics of making the info
available or with creating the release notes content.
Thanks,
Greg S
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:26:22 -0500 From: "Martin Langhoff"
<martin.langhoff at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5 upgrade
notes To: "Douglas Bagnall" <douglas at paradise.net.nz> Cc: server-devel
<server-devel at lists.laptop.org> Message-ID:
<46a038f90811120726x2a54e506ndd75535a0ec136ae at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at
12:31 AM, Douglas Bagnall <douglas at paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> > Some issues noticed with an upgrade from XS 0.4 to a XS 0.5 candidate.
> >
> > 1. eth0 and eth1 swapped physical ports.
> > After swapping the cables and `service network restart`,
everything was good.
Yeah, that's worthy of a release note commment, and a pointer to
xs-swapnics which does the job too :-)
> > I think Martin is working on #3. #4 is (theoretically) fixed. The
> > others look WONTFIX-able.
Agree.
> > At this point I tried to yum upgrade to get changes I'd made since
> > spinning the ISO, but nothing happened, because:
> >
> > [root at schoolserver1 ~]# yum repolist
> > repo id repo name status
> > fedora Fedora 7 - i386
enabled : 7,382
> > olpc OLPC 7 - i386
enabled : 83
> > updates Fedora 7 - i386 - Updates
enabled : 4,545
> >
> > Yum still wants to use the XS 0.4 repos. This seems to be related to
> > #8033 and the use of the alternate /etc/yum.repos.olpc.d/, but I'm not
> > entirely sure of the solution.
Ouch. So it's still using the old/bad yum config file? That'd be
something to look into around the xs-config upgrade path where we try
to fixup overwritten files.
good spotting,
m
-- martin.langhoff at gmail.com martin at laptop.org -- School Server
Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny
stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
More information about the Server-devel
mailing list