[Server-devel] /etc/xs-sigchecks-enabled
Martin Langhoff
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Wed Nov 5 21:16:47 EST 2008
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Douglas Bagnall <douglas at paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> Yes, a rename and clarification of semantics is quite doable, and
> sooner is better. I might be able to do it tonight or tomorrow.
That'd be _fantastic_.
> By default, the xs-check script errors if the flag is not there; you
> need to use the --tolerate-nosigs option to get the 'you can do
> anything' behaviour.
I had to read up on xs-check - it's just a simpler friend of xs-sum .
Would it not be easier and less suprising if both tools had the same
behaviour? We can define that the general concept is that
if -e /etc/xs-security-on or "--strict" is passed then be strict,
otherwise just check consistency if relevant (xs-sum)
which means that xs-check can just shortcut to exit 0 in some cases.
But it simplifies our callers significantly.
does that sound good?
m
--
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
More information about the Server-devel
mailing list