<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/14/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Frieder Ferlemann</b> <<a href="mailto:frieder.ferlemann@web.de">frieder.ferlemann@web.de</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Albert,<br><br>Albert Cahalan schrieb:<br>> On 8/14/07, Richard A. Smith <<a href="mailto:richard@laptop.org">richard@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>> So if a LLNMH algorithm is to be produced it will probably have to be
<br>>> reverse engineered from what ever we are allowed to release and from the<br>>> existing EC binary.<br><br>It's not certain that a reverse engineering approach<br>will necessarily turn out to give the best result.
<br><br>If we accept a medium time scale (whatever that is)<br>for openec then modelling the chemistry and evaluating<br>near optimal charge algorithms for the XO would for example<br>be a very motivating factor for students doing their
<br>diploma theses and their supervisors.</blockquote><div><br>i agree with this, joel and richard have access to the close code, so they can tell like a flowchart about what the code is doing and trow that information to the open source guys (like me and frieder..), so with that we dont have the need for a reverse engineering, maybe for the medium scale is most desirable..btw i have to make something for my thesis, so maybe the first part of this investigation would be nice for me to do, but anyway this i just a though i dunno if that can be done.
<br><br><br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
<br>OLPC Colombia<br><a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Colombia">http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Colombia</a>