[Sur] [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon
martin en martindengler.com
Vie Sep 15 14:16:03 EDT 2017
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:12:28AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
>Motion: To answer the questions posed by the SFC regarding the xo-computer
>icon as follows:
>(Q1) Why is the XO logo included in the sugar-artwork repo now -- and does
>the SLOBs want to keep it there?
>(A1) The xo-computer icon has been part of Sugar since we first designed
>and built Sugar (beginning in 2006) and we would like to keep it there
>until such time as the design team decides there is a reason to change it.
>(Q2) Assuming the SLOBs want to keep the XO logo in sugar-artwork: what
>outcome would the SLOBs *prefer* to see happen? E.g.,
>- Does Sugar want downstream users to be able to redistribute and modify
>Sugar's codebase with or without the XO trademark file included in the
>- Does the SLOBs want downstream users to be able to modify and
>redistribute the XO trademark image itself, or is that less important to
>(A2) Sugar Artwork, including the xo-computer icon, is currently licensed
>under the GPL and we would like our downstream users to be able to use all
>of our artwork under the terms of that license. As far as the use of any
>trademark image outside of the context of Sugar, we have no opinion.
I believe the motion has passed. https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions#2017-09-15
Motion 2017-09-15 "Motion regarding xo-computer icon"
Votes and SLOB members (in order listed on
+1 Walter Bender 
+1 Lionel Laské 
+1 Sameer Verma 
Adam Holt 
+1 Samson Goddy 
+1 Ignacio Rodríguez 
-1 Laura Vargas 
+4 Total to-date
4. Nothing found as of 2017-09-15 19:11 GMT on http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2017-September/thread.html
------------ próxima parte ------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: no disponible
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: no disponible
Más información sobre la lista de distribución olpc-Sur