[Sur] [IAEP] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

[Andres Aguirre]

Same for me :(
El 06/05/2016 12:38, "José Miguel García" <logobot en gmail.com> escribió:

> Estimados:
> Lamentablemente estoy trancado en el trabajo, por lo que no podré
> participar en la reunion de hoy.
> Disculpas
>
> Saludos
> El may 6, 2016 12:09 PM, "Walter Bender" <walter.bender en gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dave Crossland <dave en lab6.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 6 May 2016 at 10:35, Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho en hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am hoping all the differences have been ironed out and that my motions
>> > receive a majority vote.
>>
>> I just checked
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16jIFuZ9bX-Bv675BpA1KmcEcRcX4PRCOUEX0ICRUkOc/edit
>> and it still has a lot of my suggestions to be reviewed by Caryl, and
>> as she says,
>>
>> > I noticed, the last time I checked, amounts for $X and $Y had not been
>> > discussed. They are an important part of the motion.
>>
>> So I don't the motion for a finance manager can be passed today.
>>
>> However, can SLOBs pass a motion at any time? (And so the monthly
>> meetings are just to ensure no motions go undecided for more than a
>> month?)
>>
>> If so then I hope Caryl can firm up the motion and it can be passed
>> within May :)
>>
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Dave
>>
>
> I agree that there are a number of open issues in the motions. Re Motion
> 1, I am on the fence about making it a paid position: I have seen no
> evidence that that will make a difference, but I am willing to give it a
> shot. Re Motion 2, I have asked for evidence that (1) we are solving a real
> problem and (2) if it is not better to delegate low-volume/low-threshold
> spending authority to the teams, where the knowledge resides. (For example,
> Bernie, as head of the infrastructure team, could have unilaterally
> approved the request for the domain name payment. He already has that
> authority.) I am fine with the other two motions as written.
>
> -walter
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lista olpc-Sur
> olpc-Sur en lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lista olpc-Sur
> olpc-Sur en lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
>
>
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/attachments/20160508/632b1d7b/attachment.html>