[Sur] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] Motion (1 of 2) GSoC Stipends

Walter Bender walter.bender en gmail.com
Lun Jun 6 10:47:58 EDT 2016


+1 from me as well

(I had reclused myself from voting on the earlier version of this motion
due to a conflict of interest in that I am a potential recipient of the
funds, but since I have said that I will not accept the funds for my
personal use, I think it is OK to vote.)

-walter

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Claudia Urrea <claudia at laptop.org> wrote:

> + 1
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I second the motion and approve it.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On 06/04/2016 03:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>> We did not have time to take action on two motions at yesterday's
>> meeting. Please review the motion below. If an oversight board seconds the
>> motion, then we can bring it up for a vote by email.
>>
>> regards.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>>
>> Motion regarding GSoC mentoring stipends
>>
>> Motion: Whereas it is the general policy of Sugar Labs to retain all GSoC
>> mentoring stipends in the General Fund, if a mentor asks a GSoC Admin (for
>> example in 2016, Walter or Lionel) to pay a stipend to a mentor, their
>> share of the stipend amount will be disbursed without further motions to
>> approve the spending. The share is calculated from the total awarded for
>> the GSoC slot by Google, minus 10% (as all Sugar Labs income is donated to
>> Software Freedom Conservancy for organisational services), minus 5%
>> (retained for Sugar Labs General Funds),  divided by the number of mentors
>> for the project. For example, in a year with 6 slots and 10 mentors at
>> $500, the total revenue is $3,000; 10% for Conservancy is $300 and 5% for
>> Sugar Labs is $150, leaving a total of $2,550 or $255 per mentor.
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Note that an earlier version of this motion failed:
>>
>> Failed Motion
>>
>> Motion: To allow the mentors participating in Google Summer of Code to
>> disperse the mentor stipend among themselves as they see fit.
>>
>> Further discussion of this motion can be found beginning at [1].
>>
>> [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2016-May/018130.html
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing listSugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Claudia Urrea, PhD
> OLPCA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
<http://www.sugarlabs.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/attachments/20160606/6ecfe819/attachment.html>


Más información sobre la lista de distribución olpc-Sur