[Sur] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
cbigenho en hotmail.com
Vie Dic 2 12:36:56 EST 2016
I would assume they do wish to stand for re-election. The publicity on this has been terrible. I don't know who is in charge, but they should have made sure they sent several reminders of deadlines to file for candidacy. In fact, was there ever an announcement sent out to all of the membership asking if they wish to run and giving deadlines and a timeline? I didn't see even one. This has always been done in the past. It looks like someone is trying to rig the election! (Sorry... but that is how some of us from the US feel about elections right now!)
From: IAEP <iaep-bounces en lists.sugarlabs.org> on behalf of Laura Vargas <laura en somosazucar.org>
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 8:44:55 AM
To: Dave Crossland
Cc: iaep; Sugar-dev Devel; OLPC para usuarios, docentes, voluntarios y administradores; SLOBs
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
2016-12-02 11:38 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland <dave en lab6.com<mailto:dave en lab6.com>>:
On 2 December 2016 at 11:28, Laura Vargas <laura en somosazucar.org<mailto:laura en somosazucar.org>> wrote:
2016-12-02 11:27 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland <dave en lab6.com<mailto:dave en lab6.com>>:
On 2 December 2016 at 11:24, Laura Vargas <laura en somosazucar.org<mailto:laura en somosazucar.org>> wrote:
Looks like we have 3 seats for 3 candidates :D
6 candidates, assuming the 3 people in those 3 seats want to stand for reeleection?
Why would you assume this?
Why would you not? :D
Because you announced elections will take place first week of December. If they were interested I'm sure they would already expressed interest as Ignacio, Samson and I.
At least some interest in setting up the elections, don't you think?
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
Más información sobre la lista de distribución olpc-Sur