On Jan 20, 2008 2:04 AM, Carol Lerche <<a href="mailto:cafl@msbit.com">cafl@msbit.com</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Truly the wiki is NOT the best way to organize content such as the activities page.</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I
think we need a search by age/grade level, subject matter, localization,
countries using, minimum build requirement, maturity/bugginess, tag (where an
app could have multiple tags that were optional and possibly
pejorative!)
<br></blockquote><div><br>There are perfectly fine and useable ways to do this using the current MediaWiki software, it may just need a few extentions. <br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The current activity page is pretty hard to use -- in the computer science/database world I think we could term it a "heap".<br></blockquote><div>Agreed. If someone could figure out how wikipedia does
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software#General_Information">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software#General_Information</a>
, that sort of thing would work well on the activities page.<br><br>-ffm<br></div></div>