[Olpc-open] Teacher Preparation Program for the OLPC Project in Nepal — Part II , Onsite training
Edward Cherlin
echerlin at gmail.com
Mon May 5 01:45:41 EDT 2008
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Bryan Berry <bryan.berry at gmail.com> wrote:
> The stuff that needs to be translated is the 65 page teacher training
> guide. I believe that Prabhas Pokharel is interested in working on it
> but I don't know how much time he has had for it as of late.
Is he on any of these lists? I would love to discuss it with him, and
I may be able to help once there is a rough translation. I know just
enough Sanskrit to almost totally fail to understand the Nepalese. ^_^
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Image:OLENepal_Trainer%27s_Manual.pdf
>
> I still need to post it in Word format to the wiki. That's my fault
>
> It's a pretty amazing document, takes lots of Constructionist examples
> from Piaget and Vygotsky that kids learn differently than we
> traditionally expect them to. Then takes those examples and explains how
> XO's can be used to help kids in the manner they naturally do.
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 22:00 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> > This is all excellent. It becomes even more urgent to have this
> > material translated to English. Whom do we know who can help? Can
> > others here ask for help through their networks on LinkedIn and other
> > sites, or just their accumulated contacts in their address books, or
> > any appropriate mailing lists?
> >
> > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Bryan Berry <bryan.berry at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dr. Saurav Dev Bhatta posted the review of the second week of teacher
> > > training, which took place on-site at the schools
> > >
> > > http://blog.olenepal.org/index.php/archives/283
> > >
> > >
> > > We have just completed Part II of our teacher preparation program. The
> > > complete teacher training consisted of two segments:
> > >
> > > Part I) A 4 day intensive residential, out-of-school training that
> > > focuses on integrating digitial educational materials and ICT-based
> > > teaching approaches in the regular classroom instruction process. This
> > > was completed on April 1, 2008. An earlier blog post has details about
> > > this segment of the training.
> > >
> > > Part II) A 4 day training in the teachers' regular classrooms where they
> > > get hand-on experience in developing, implementing, and fine-tuning
> > > child-centric, interactive, ICT-integrated lesson plans. This was
> > > completed on Friday, May 2, 2008. The current post is about this segment
> > > only.
> > >
> > > Training location
> > >
> > > For Bashuki teachers, the training was held at Bashuki Lower Secondary
> > > School itself. Similarly, for Bishwamitra teachers, it was held at
> > > Bishwamitra Lower Secondary School.
> > >
> > > Why in-school training?
> > >
> > > Important fact: TEACHING THE KIDS HOW TO USE THE LAPTOPS IS A RELATIVELY
> > > EASY TASK. THEY PICK IT UP IN NO TIME (within a few hours!!).
> > >
> > > Even more important fact: THE REAL CHALLENGE IS INTEGRATING THE LAPTOP
> > > AND THE AVAILABLE DIGITAL CONTENT IN THE REGULAR CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION
> > > PROCESS.
> > >
> > > The residential portion of the training did give the teachers some
> > > experience in integrating E-Paati in the classroom process (apart from
> > > making them completely familiar with the use of the laptop). But the
> > > simulated classroom environment in any residential training is a far cry
> > > from the actual setting in their own schools. Furthermore, since each
> > > school is very different in terms of physical infrastructure, student
> > > composition, community involvement and other resources, there are unique
> > > practical challenges associated with each school. So we felt that it
> > > would be very useful to give teachers hands-on experience in integrating
> > > E-Paati in their regular classrooms.
> > >
> > > There is another important reason why in-school training is important in
> > > this case. In most teacher training programs, it is possible for
> > > teachers to learn about new approaches to teaching outside their school
> > > (for example, through practice teaching in another school) and they can
> > > take this knowledge to their own classrooms later. But in the present
> > > context, successful implementation in the classroom also requires the
> > > students themselves to learn about the new approach to learning and
> > > teaching. And this can only happen in the school where the laptop
> > > program is being implemented.
> > >
> > > Structure of the training
> > >
> > > Each day of the training was divided into four major segments:
> > >
> > > 1. Lesson plan review and revision
> > >
> > > * Content: group review of lesson plan for the day.
> > > * Participants: all the teachers in the schools + facilitators
> > > from OLE Nepal
> > > * Time allocated: 1 hour (before the start of classes)
> > >
> > > 2. Classroom instruction and observation
> > >
> > > * Content: classroom teaching according to the lesson plan
> > > * Participants: teachers (one teacher teaches the students; the
> > > rest are observers) + OLE Nepal observers + students
> > > * Time allocated: 3 to 4 full class periods (one period = 45
> > > minutes in Bashuki; one period = 40 minutes in Bishwamitra)
> > >
> > > 3. Feedback
> > >
> > > * Content: discussion on the day's experience (strengths,
> > > weaknesses, recommendations for improvement)
> > > * Participants: all teachers + OLE Nepal facilitators
> > > * Time allocated: 1-1.5 hours
> > >
> > > 4. Lesson planning for the next day
> > >
> > > * Content: development of a detailed lesson plans for each class
> > > * Participants: teachers delivering the lectures in these classes
> > > * Time allocated: 1 hour
> > >
> > > On the first day of the training (Saturday, April 26), the teachers
> > > focused on teaching the students how to use the laptop and the E-Paati
> > > activities in the laptop. This was done in two 1.5 hour long sessions.
> > >
> > > During the remaining four days, the teachers conducted regular math and
> > > English classes in grades two and six according to the ICT-integrated
> > > lesson plans they developed. At Bishwamitra the ICT-integrated classes
> > > were held on Sunday (April 27) , Monday (April 28), Tuesday (April 29)
> > > and Wednesday (April 30). Bashuki conducted similar classes starting
> > > Monday (April 29). But since they had decided to keep the laptops in
> > > school for this first week of classes, they set aside Wednesday (April
> > > 30) for giving students more practice on how to use the laptops. They
> > > had a break on Thursday and completed the training program on Friday
> > > (May 2).
> > >
> > > Overview of content covered in the training
> > >
> > > Lesson planning: Integrating ICT-based educational materials in the
> > > classroom requires teachers to carefully plan their lessons. We wanted
> > > to give the teachers a very simple framework for developing lesson plans
> > > so that they would continue to use it even after the training. If they
> > > were to use it throughout the year, they would have to see that planning
> > > the lessons would not really take up too much of their time—and that it
> > > would help them in their other classes as well.
> > >
> > > Each lesson plan in this training consisted of the following: a) listing
> > > of the learning objectives of the class, b) listing and brief
> > > descriptions of the topics or activities to be covered in the class, and
> > > c) listing of time allocated for each topic or activity. E-Paati
> > > activites were integrated in each lesson plan as one of the many
> > > activities covered to meet the learning objectives of the class. We
> > > emphasized that the goal should be to integrate E-paati in the classroom
> > > lesson plan; not devise a lesson plan around the E-Paati activities. As
> > > a rule of thumb, we emphasized that E-Paati use should not take up more
> > > than 40% of the total time allocated for the class.
> > >
> > > Lesson plan review and revision: The lesson plans developed were
> > > critically reviewed and revised by all the teachers together to make
> > > sure that a) the learning objectives of lesson were properly clarified,
> > > b) the topics covered—including E-Patti topics—were consistent with the
> > > stated learning objectives, and c) the time allocated for each
> > > topic/activity was appropriate.
> > >
> > > Classroom instruction and observation: This segment of the daily
> > > training was designed to (i) give subject teachers hands-on experience
> > > in teaching according to the integrated lesson plans and (ii) enable
> > > other teachers to critically examine the teaching-learning process in
> > > the regular classroom. Hence, while the subject teacher was conducting
> > > the lesson, the other teachers noted down their critical observations in
> > > the following areas:
> > >
> > > a) Classroom structure (including appropriateness of seating
> > > arrangement, placement of charging racks, seat assignment schemes etc.)
> > >
> > > b) Correspondence between lesson plan and practice
> > >
> > > c) Time on task (effective use of time from the perspective of student
> > > learning)
> > >
> > > d) Interaction (student—student; student—teacher) and participation of
> > > students in the learning process
> > >
> > > e) Instruction delivery (clarity, adequacy of explanations, …)
> > >
> > > f) Time and classroom management (including tackling disruptive behavior
> > > on the part of students)
> > >
> > >
> > > Feedback session: Feedback sessions were held at the end of each day to
> > > critically review the classroom process. The teachers delivering the
> > > lectures worked with the observers to analyze the strengths and
> > > weaknesses of the classes held that day focusing on the six areas listed
> > > above. Through these discussions, the participants were able to identify
> > > areas that needed improvement and develop strategies for tackling
> > > problems.
> > >
> > > Grade 2 students at Bishwamitra (English class)–totally into it!
> > >
> > >
> > > Grade 6 students at Bishwamitra (math class)
> > >
> > >
> > > Bishwamitra grade 6 students working intesnsely-1
> > >
> > > Staff involved in the training
> > >
> > > Facilitators/observers:
> > >
> > > * Saurav Dev Bhatta and Rabi Karmacharya (all five days)
> > > * Kamana Regmi (three days); Bipul Gautam (one day).
> > >
> > > Most interesting outcomes
> > >
> > > * Grade 6 students in both schools took just one day to become
> > > familiar with using the laptops!
> > > * The children at Bishwamitra were allowed to take the laptops
> > > home immediately after receiving them. The children at Bashuki,
> > > however, did not take the computers home this first week. Not
> > > surprisingly, we observed that the Bashuki kids were much more
> > > familiar with the machines by the second day of the training.
> > > The difference was more pronounced in the case of grade 2
> > > children—it took two days for the Bashuki grade 2 students to
> > > get the hang of things, while it took the Bishwamitra kids only
> > > one day.
> > > * In both schools, the teachers had no experience in designing and
> > > using systematic lesson plans. They were very appreciative of
> > > the experience they gained during this training period.
> > > * One of the main challenges teachers initially faced when
> > > designing ICT-integrated lessons was in focusing on the learning
> > > objectives rather than on the E-Paati activities.
> > > * The biggest difficulties faced by the teachers in the classroom
> > > were a) getting the attention of students and b) managing the
> > > time. Once the students had the laptops in front of them, they
> > > were generally oblivious to what the teacher was saying. It was,
> > > therefore, very difficult for the teacher to cover all the
> > > material that needed to be covered in that class period. For
> > > example, on the second day of the training, the classes ran up
> > > to 30 minutes overtime on the second day of the training.
> > > * It was much more challenging for the teachers to get the
> > > attention of the grade 2 students. In fact, on the first day,
> > > there was chaos in the grade 2 classes in both schools!
> > > * Initially, just the process of getting the laptops from the
> > > charging racks and putting them back after use took up a
> > > significant amount of time.
> > > * The most effective ways of getting the attention of students
> > > were as follows: asking all the students to close the laptops;
> > > asking them to clap together, or stand up and stretch together;
> > > producing an alien sound that would grab their attention (for
> > > example, rattling a can of marbles).
> > > * In the case of grade 6, by the end of the training, the teachers
> > > had completely figured out how to efficiently and effectively
> > > conduct E-Paati integrated classes within the time period
> > > allocated for the class. But they felt that it would perhaps
> > > take another week for them to fine tune the classroom process in
> > > grade 2.
> > > * Bishwamitra teachers Manoj (who teachers grade 6 math) and Bhim
> > > (who teaches grade 2 math) were naturals at designing and
> > > implementing E-Paati integrated classes. Very impressive!
> > > * The teachers in both schools felt that the most useful parts of
> > > the training were the feedback sessions at the end of the day
> > > and the lesson planning sessions.
> > > * The biggest technical problem during this period was the jumpy
> > > cursor. The problem was particularly bad at Bashuki. This is
> > > something we have to fix!!
> > >
> > > Grade 2 students at Bashuki–a different seating arrangement!
> > >
> > > Bashuki grade 2 students-1Bashuki grade 2 students-2
> > >
> > > Grade 6 students at Bashuki
> > >
> > > Bashuki grade 6 students-1
> > >
> > > Our main "mantras" for the training
> > >
> > > * The learning objectives should determine when and how E-Paati is
> > > used in class, not the other way round
> > > * E-paati should be viewed as one of the many tools and activities
> > > used to achieve the learning objectives
> > > * The goal is to integrate E-paati in the classroom lesson plan;
> > > not devise a lesson plan around the E-Paati activities
> > > * Effective classroom management can make the class; ineffective
> > > classroom management can break the class
> > > * Proper lesson planning is the key to successful integration of
> > > E-Paati in the classroom
> > > * End-of-the day group review of lessons is the key to improvement
> > >
> > > Saurav Dev Bhatta, Education Director
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bryan W. Berry
> > > Systems Engineer
> > > OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Edward Cherlin
End Poverty at a Profit by teaching children business
http://www.EarthTreasury.org/
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."--Alan Kay
More information about the Olpc-open
mailing list