[Olpc-open] Olpc-open Digest, Vol 17, Issue 13
gnome
gnome at greenglim.com
Tue Nov 27 16:16:29 EST 2007
Neophile early adopter, here. I'll make a confession: I've used linux
for years, but I'm no black belt geek, so who knows if I'll be smart
enough to figure out the Sugar interface. I bought it anyway, and I'll
tell you why: sunlight-readable screen and long battery life. I do a
lot of writing, and I like to do it anywhere, including out on the
beach, on mountaintops, wherever. I'm hopeful that the Green Machine
will be a light, sturdy, use-anywhere writing machine. The small
keyboard may be a problem, but I've used a Treo. I know for a fact it's
bigger than that.
I didn't pay $400 out of charity. I'm 100% in favor of the OLPC ideals
and project, but in monetary terms, 100% would probably be about $25. I
paid $400 because it's the only thing out there, at that price, that can
do what I need it to do. That's in sunny, cutting edge, Southern
California. (The warm glow from knowing I'm also helping somebody is
just lagniappe.)
So, anyway, the point of all this is that nobody really knows what
anybody else's priorities are. Just because I'm an urbanite, doesn't
mean the Eee is for me. The life of a rural farmer is different from
mine, and mine is different from yours. The Green Machine won't suit
some people, and will suit others down to the ground. The important
thing is to have *choices*.
And that's the thing that really freaks me out, watching the Intels and
Microsofts trying to figure out how to squash the OLPC before it gets
beond them. It's not that their machines are useless. It's that we
need more than one kind of machine, and I worry that they're trying to
make sure we don't get that.
quixote.
--
http://molvray.com/acid-test
More information about the Olpc-open
mailing list