[olpc-nz] [support-gang] which Sugar(s) will/should run on XO's? [was: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94]

Tabitha Roder tabitha at hrdnz.com
Fri Sep 18 17:57:33 EDT 2009


Hi

The New Zealand Wellington based Volunteer group meet EVERY WEEK and if you
ask us to test we will. See us at: http://laptop.org.nz or
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Projects/WellyNZTesters

Volunteers who participate in our group are a mix of developers, testers,
humanitarians, educators and advocates who want OLPC and Sugar to succeed in
bringing education opportunities to children in developing countries.

We can test on XOs on whatever build you want.  We can test any activity you
want.
We can test SoaS from USB and we can test Sugar running on virtual machines.

We have a variety of hardware available to us (as in our own laptops seem to
be varied).

Be clear on what tests you want, how you want the results to be delivered
and who is the contact person/group for each test. We spend most of our time
wondering who wants us to test things, so without instruction we aim our
efforts at raising awareness of OLPC and Sugar wherever we can, speaking at
events and writing in our blogs and on our sites.

Contact us at olpc-nz at lists.laptop.org and tell us what you would like us to
test.

Thanks
Tabitha



2009/9/19 Adam Holt <holt at laptop.org>

>  I agree with Tomeu below if we can begin very deliberately working with
> him and others to plan here -- we cannot spread ourselves too thin
> supporting too many builds/ditstros or we will quite simply fail.
>
> Expanding support for new hardware (XO-1.5) is confusion enough, as we are
> barely surviving the torrent of help at laptop.org emails today.
>
> But if the 200 of us can unite around a particular build (similar to
> Release 8.2.x whose stability is the only reason we survived the past year!)
> for the coming year then we Have A Shot :)
> --A!
>
>
>   Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94  Date: Fri,
> 18 Sep 2009 10:06:18 +0200  From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at sugarlabs.org><tomeu at sugarlabs.org>  To:
> Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> <dsd at laptop.org>  CC: David Farning
> <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> <dfarning at sugarlabs.org>, Jim Simmons
> <nicestep at gmail.com> <nicestep at gmail.com>, sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org,
> Adam Holt <holt at laptop.org> <holt at laptop.org>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 19:45, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
> > 2009/9/17 David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> <dfarning at sugarlabs.org>:
> >> One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to
> >> gather momentum around a series of stable releases.
> >>
> >> One thought that might work is to set .84, .88, .94, and 1.0 as stable
> >> releases for down streams to unite around.
> >
> > That would be useful but actually the critical area lacking resources
> > right now is people working on OS building and deployment
> > technologies. If I can tame your interest in getting new Sugar on XO
> > in a deployment-quality release, finding resources to work on these
> > resources would be the biggest help you could provide.
>
> I personally think that making possible for XO-1 owners to upgrade to
> recent Sugar releases is very important for Sugar Labs, and if we are
> the only organization that can take this challenge, then we should do
> it.
>
> But if we decided to go for it, I see two fundamental pieces missing:
>
> - someone to coordinate the effort,
>
> - a team of people willing to test new images, file bug reports, help
> with triaging, etc.
>
> How can we get that? Maybe the OLPC Support Gang would like to get
> involved in this? People from existing deployments?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tomeu
>
> --
> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
> Farning
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> support-gang mailing list
> support-gang at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-nz/attachments/20090919/8f3c2f2f/attachment.htm 


More information about the olpc-nz mailing list