<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Chris Leonard <<a href="mailto:cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com">cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Diane Serley <<a href="mailto:olpc.aunti.mame@gmail.com" target="_blank">olpc.aunti.mame@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Am I just being old-fashioned? <br><br></blockquote>
</div><div>Not to put too fine a point on it, but you are formatting Jane Eyre, so maybe a just little old-fashioned :-)</div></div></blockquote><div><br>LOL <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div></div>
<div> </div><br><div>Slightly off-topic, there was a time when serialization of novels was all the rage and I have to wonder if such a work might be the exception where HTML actually conveys the author's intent (and original reader's experience) even more accurately than current bound versions. </div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>I'd actually thought of doing that for Dickens, who almost always serialized...<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div></div>
<div> </div></div><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>