Thanks Chris, <br><br>That's a good place to put the requests. Andriani and other lawyers and legal mavens working on OLPC look there, though I don't think many of them have them explicitly on their watchlists (note to all : you may want to update your wiki preferences to automatically add pages you edit to your watchlist...)<br>
<br>Andriani, while I know this is already being taken care of, the Gardner podcast series should get an entry there as well...<br><br>SJ<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Chris Leonard <<a href="mailto:cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com">cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>I've posted Carol's suggestion on the Licensing Petitions page (<a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Licensing_petitions" target="_blank">http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Licensing_petitions</a>) so that it doesn't just disappear into the list archives.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>SJ, I see only one watching user on that page. There are any number of good content collections that may need a little bit more licensing investigation and discussion with copyright holders than perhaps the average volunteer can or will perform. Is putting an idea on the Licensing Petitions page a suitable mechanism for capturing ideas for possible follow-up? It seems to me that if someone authorizes distribution of material initially published under a more stringent copyright license, OLPC would want to keep records of that in some fashion and not just depend on forwarded e-mails from volunteers.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>cjl</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Library mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Library@lists.laptop.org">Library@lists.laptop.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/library" target="_blank">http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/library</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>