<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft SafeHTML">
<style>
.hmmessage P
{margin:0px;padding:0px;}
body.hmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
</style>
Yes. When it comes to developing content that can be developed by the community, its clearly a community driven effort. As far as I can see, technologies like OLPC can hardly be developed by the community while the content surely can be. I guess Apple may bea better example. The value of using it lies in the communities. So the applications need to be developed by what some call crowd-sourcing though I find community easier to understand.<br><br><br><div>Sincerely,<br>
S Adhikari<br></div><br><br><br><br>> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:03:37 +0530<br>> Subject: Re: [OLPC India] Digital Bridge<br>> From: nagarjun@gnowledge.org<br> <br>> <br>> I agree with you that not just anybody can represent an organization,<br>> there must be a clarification that is better than the analogy given<br>> above. The analogy indicates strict ownership of OLPC India. If you<br>> wish OLPC India to be a community driven organization, as is the case<br>> with other free software projects, we wish it to be different. Some<br>> more clarification is required on who can represent?<br>> <br>> --<br>> Nagarjuna<br> </body>
</html>