<div>Richard Stallman has been trying to get his idea of "Free" accepted as he would like for quite some time. He is a leader in his own right and has energised a whole movement of "Free" software.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>However, XO is for children. Its for those who need to learn and are not already the leaders of a movement, though I hope they will all have access to the world that will make a potential leader out of everyone.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>My request is that these debates, important as they are, may not belong here.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This forum may be far more useful as a way to get the XO reach all those who need it rather than have ideological debates, which must go on at the right places.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks mch.<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Saswat Praharaj <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:saswat_praharaj@yahoo.com">saswat_praharaj@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Courier New,courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif">
<div><a href="http://www.bostonreview.net/BR33.6/stallman.php" target="_blank">http://www.bostonreview.net/BR33.6/stallman.php</a><br><br>
<p>Snip >>>.</p>
<p>The One Laptop Per Child project, launched by MIT professor Nicholas Negroponte in 2003, was supposed to lead millions of children around the world to information technology and freedom. The plans aimed for low cost, enabling many children to use the machines, and free software, so they would have freedom while using them. I thought it was a good idea; I even planned to use one myself when I found in the OLPC's promise of free software a way to escape the proprietary startup programs that all commercial laptops used.</p>
<p>But just as I was switching to an OLPC, the project backed away from its commitment to freedom and allowed the machine to become a platform for running Windows, a non-free operating system.</p>
<p>What makes this issue so important, and OLPC's retreat from free software so unfortunate, is that the "free" in free software refers to freedom of knowledge and action, not to price. A program (whatever job it does) is free software if you, the user, have the four essential freedoms:</p>
<p>>>>>>>...<br></p>
<p><br></p><br></div></div><br>
<hr size="1">
Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. <a href="http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_2/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/" target="_blank">Get it now</a></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
India mailing list<br><a href="mailto:India@lists.laptop.org">India@lists.laptop.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/india" target="_blank">http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/india</a><br><br></blockquote></div>
<br>