[Http-crcsync] General comments on crcsync document

[Rusty Russell]

On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:41:08 am Alex Wulms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about making crc32c the default, that must be supported by any crcsync
> server and client but foresee in the protocol that other algorithms might
> be added in future if pilot testing by early adapters might show that crc32
> gives too many clashes in practice or if crc32 works fine for most people
> but in a specific deployment with a specific usage scenario it turns out to
> be too weak.

OK... let's change back :)

Rusty.