I have asked Nicholas to allow me to post his private e-mail messages to me about the biggest current question, Sugar on Windows, and on other matters. These include much of what we discuss here.<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><ul><li>Talking to and listening to the community</li><li>Pronouncements to the press</li><li>Dissing Open Source<br></li><li>XOs for the developed world</li><li>Making some money to fund other necessities</li>
<li>and the rest of my <a href="http://olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=2436.msg20490#msg20490" target="_blank">suggestions for the new CEO</a><br>
</li></ul>Nicholas has written to me twice, and promises more. I have suggested an open forum, perhaps in due time a conference of the stakeholders in Cambridge. That should include <br><ul><li>The Board of Directors</li>
<li>The Board of Advisors</li><li>Management and Staff</li><li>Volunteers</li><li>Children and Parents</li><li>Teachers, Administrators, and Education Officials</li><li>Governments and NGOs who want XOs for children anywhere</li>
</ul>Well, we'll see what comes out of the current private discussion.<br><br>The short version of the main issue is that Nicholas got the bright idea of trying to outsmart Microsoft and use Microsoft's marketing muscle to get XOs running Sugar to children faster than Sugar on Linux. The community doesn't mind Microsoft spending its own money to port Sugar to Windows, if they like. But talk of putting OLPC money and people into this project has sparked open revolt. Among our major objections:<br>
<ul><li>Scott Ananian wrote<font size="2"> <a href="http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-April/013242.html" target="_blank">A technical assessment of porting "Sugar" to Windows</a></font> <br></li><li>I pointed out, from my experience as a long-time high-tech market analyst, some of the wreckage of those who thought they could outsmart Microsoft. Always remember, an 800 lb. gorilla doesn't need to outsmart <i>you</i>.</li>
<li>If anybody tries to make the volunteers work on proprietary software, we can (and many will) walk. We can and will fork Sugar if necessary.</li><li>The mission is education and other human rights for all children, thus ending poverty worldwide. Among the necessary rights in the view of the community is Software Freedom. And guess what? There are still poor people in the US who don't rate a genuine education in the current system.<br>
</li></ul>I have told Nicholas, and the community, and everybody on the Board of Directors and the Board of Advisors that I have an e-mail address for, that in my opinion and much of the community, Nicholas is endangering the mission. I'm waiting to hear back from the Boards as well. <br>
<br>And if Nicholas talks to you, please let me and the community know. OK?<br><font color="#888888"><br></font></div>--<br>Edward Cherlin<br>End Poverty at a Profit by teaching children business<br><a href="http://www.EarthTreasury.org/">http://www.EarthTreasury.org/</a><br>
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."--Alan Kay