<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Luxi Sans'; font-size:11pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On April 9, 2009, Bert Freudenberg wrote:<br>
> On 09.04.2009, at 06:58, Milan Zimmermann wrote:<br>
> > On April 7, 2009, Bert Freudenberg wrote:<br>
> > > Begin forwarded message:<br>
> > > > From: Wade Brainerd <wadetb@gmail.com><br>
> > > > Date: 7. April 2009 01:05:09 MESZ<br>
> > > > To: Sugar Devel <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org><br>
> > > > Subject: [Sugar-devel] Unified Bundles<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Hi all,<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Aleksey finally prodded me (by creating an empty page and<br>
> ><br>
> > pointing me<br>
> ><br>
> > > > at it) into writing down my idea for Unified bundles which<br>
> ><br>
> > merges .xol<br>
> ><br>
> > > > and .xo files together.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > It diverged somewhat into a plan to recast activities which do not<br>
> > > > support actually creating anything as "Content viewers". Those are<br>
> > > > ones like Read, Read Etexts, View Slides, Jukebox, etc.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Unified_Bundles<br>
> ><br>
> > Actually, I have a question. Paste from the link above:<br>
> > ==========<br>
> > Etoys-based Unified content bundles are made up of a Squeak script<br>
> > or Etoys project. The activity.info file contains the line:<br>
> > exec sugar-etoys-activity [options] <squeak_file><br>
> > =====<br>
> > In the freecell-1.xo:<br>
> > exec = FreeCell.sh<br>
> > ======<br>
> > I assume<br>
> > sugar-etoys-activity <==> FreeCell.sh<br>
> > Is the website obsolete? (note the = missing in the website line)<br>
><br>
> The website is just a proposal, it's not agreed upon, much less<br>
> implemented.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>I see, thanks.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>><br>
> In fact the "Unified Bundles" are not really needed for Etoys anyway,<br>
> because our bundles already are very lean and only have a tiny shell<br>
> script (like in the FreeCell case). The proposal IMHO applies only to<br>
> activities that have a significant amount of code in their bundle,<br>
> which should not be duplicated in each "content bundle".<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>ok,<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Thanks, Milan<br>
><br>
> - Bert -<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p><p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p></body></html>