[Etoys] work around layout checking of msgfmt
bert at freudenbergs.de
Thu Sep 27 06:29:02 EDT 2007
On Sep 26, 2007, at 12:09 , korakurider wrote:
> Hi, Bert.
> --- Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> Are you aware of our discussions regarding reducing
>> the number of
>> translation files? While modularity is valuable, it
>> makes live harder
>> for translators and maintainers. Not sure who is
>> going to work on
>> this - you or Takashi? I filed a ticket anyway:
> I know, but...
> As in the previous discussion thread, I think more
> important questions would be
> a) for the lookup of #translated, how to know correct
> domain of the receiver of #translated. without this b)
> can't be executed in real.
Can we use the class category as text domain, and if the translation
is not found there, fall back to the one in global file?
> b) how MOs/textdomains are packaged
> After determing them we can formulate how to package
> POs, I think.
> (We have been discussing about PO first. But I think
> we need to think about textdomain first)
> My current understanding is right now we don't have
> good strategy for a). I come to deadlock around there...
> Possible workaround Takashi proposed recently is that
> we use just only one domain for whole etoys system. I
> think that is not bad, especially for FRS. How do you
If this prevents a deadlock for now, yes.
- Bert -
More information about the Etoys