<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22/10/2013 21:21, Gonzalo Odiard
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJ+iPVShU-=2bkpWjns0r7jSTCC6arZSzuQk2GjzD+7Gi1pL3Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<div dir="ltr">....<br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
So that was my $0.02. Obviously it can be too late to
change plans but who knows. I have uploaded the source
anyway so you can use it if you want.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What I really don't understand is, if is all that easy
why not be involved and help?</div>
<div>The development of the web activities stuff was done in
the open, mostly by two developers,</div>
<div>manuq & dnarvaez. Then everyone who wanted help,
could do it.</div>
<div>Say now how should be done, is .... useless at least. </div>
<div>Talk is easy... as always, the devil is in the details.
But you already know that,</div>
<div>if not would not talk about "unconstructive criticism"</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Gonzalo</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You are right. The problem is that my views are exactly the opposite
of the decided path to take. I do not help developing because I
totally oppose the current path, meaning that I do not believe that
it can work. All the easy talk can be useful later *if* they decide
to change paths. Or it will just remain an interesting viewpoint,
but at least I tried.<br>
So while you are right about the "Talk is easy" part as well, I
could only help developing by finishing the native webkit app
(because I believe in it), which would be totally wasted (parallel)
effort. Actually that was the plan but then I run out of time and
realized that the official project went a different direction
anyway.<br>
</body>
</html>