Giulia, Wad, Adam,<div><br></div><div>I'm not sure who is mainly responsible for managing <a href="mailto:country@laptop.org">country@laptop.org</a> but I just got a Delivery Status Notification when reply to the "ARM motherboards" thread over on devel. (See below.)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thought you should know.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Christoph</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Mail Delivery Subsystem</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mailer-daemon@googlemail.com">mailer-daemon@googlemail.com</a>></span><br>
Date: Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:18 AM<br>Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)<br>To: <a href="mailto:christoph.derndorfer@gmail.com">christoph.derndorfer@gmail.com</a><br><br><br>Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:<br>
<br>
<a href="mailto:country@laptop.org">country@laptop.org</a><br>
<br>
Technical details of permanent failure:<br>
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 <<a href="mailto:country@laptop.org">country@laptop.org</a>>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (state 13).<br>
<br>
----- Original message -----<br>
<br>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;<br>
d=<a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a>; s=20120113;<br>
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to<br>
:cc:content-type;<br>
bh=YlXMGmoduIsAv8uM0ZuAu5kNNTwxdYASFsnQamJDoOw=;<br>
b=yld+QMmnprata4zuDwNpA6IQ5mUvlYmUmIJqW698yCs+6tJwcQ9XZZEjfb6ir2sRY/<br>
U+aBLJe6TX95xkT0sRDX3y4dWRwfCCoSrZIc5CLKtPZD0ne5jk7/rE+1qtlwIH8/U+Df<br>
Huw3xXk0Z7TLPprZKIHxm6U9OsZE/5R6y/+xciN2dhxGs3DgCBHXOyulR6XvEjpmw3sw<br>
n1LN/horG1NdduVALNix6aAbKss9meQi2XK3Ag04k4UDOB3qTVpu/F+Az84MdWrDr75Z<br>
hfXKhRhf8PXySmKwJAWlNjqiOeWJD4alV74qkFhuT5fufu7hify4WGbZN099AI3vgqgM<br>
tQ5g==<br>
MIME-Version: 1.0<br>
Received: by 10.182.44.7 with SMTP id a7mr21153314obm.80.1347434326352; Wed,<br>
12 Sep 2012 00:18:46 -0700 (PDT)<br>
Received: by 10.60.54.165 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:18:46 -0700 (PDT)<br>
In-Reply-To: <<a href="mailto:431F668D-D1A3-41B1-A2BC-FD35607F4B91@laptop.org">431F668D-D1A3-41B1-A2BC-FD35607F4B91@laptop.org</a>><br>
References: <<a href="mailto:CAFoGK8GqQcLRDE3o1nkq%2B68vPFonh7PhTe5jpn-0tSrHE4EvKQ@mail.gmail.com">CAFoGK8GqQcLRDE3o1nkq+68vPFonh7PhTe5jpn-0tSrHE4EvKQ@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
<<a href="mailto:971F8E11-86F1-48D4-951F-D29735BC196A@laptop.org">971F8E11-86F1-48D4-951F-D29735BC196A@laptop.org</a>><br>
<<a href="mailto:CAFoGK8Ec6CVd%2By-g5mr_JAKCBFdqyo0nCJ_dwhEwKBAe7ebSqw@mail.gmail.com">CAFoGK8Ec6CVd+y-g5mr_JAKCBFdqyo0nCJ_dwhEwKBAe7ebSqw@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
<<a href="mailto:431F668D-D1A3-41B1-A2BC-FD35607F4B91@laptop.org">431F668D-D1A3-41B1-A2BC-FD35607F4B91@laptop.org</a>><br>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:18:46 +0200<br>
Message-ID: <CAKXAper1dJhd+DhE_e8cU4VCgy6k4T+XpDff_Hxpz=<a href="mailto:Gre55YQA@mail.gmail.com">Gre55YQA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: ARM motherboards<br>
From: Christoph Derndorfer <<a href="mailto:christoph.derndorfer@gmail.com">christoph.derndorfer@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: John Watlington <<a href="mailto:wad@laptop.org">wad@laptop.org</a>><br>
Cc: Sameer Verma <<a href="mailto:sverma@sfsu.edu">sverma@sfsu.edu</a>>, <a href="mailto:country@laptop.org">country@laptop.org</a>,<br>
"Devel's in the Details" <<a href="mailto:devel@lists.laptop.org">devel@lists.laptop.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044785816162c204c97c00e3<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:51 AM, John Watlington <<a href="mailto:wad@laptop.org">wad@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:43 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:<br>
><br>
> > I was walking through a replacement workflow in my mind for my Jamaica<br>
> > and India projects, and I realized that if/once the upgrades are done,<br>
> > one would be left with several older working motherboards. What's to<br>
> > become of these? If someone could design a chassis to hold a bunch of<br>
> > boards together...imagine a Beowulf cluster of these! (sorry, couldn't<br>
> > resist).<br>
><br>
><br>
> Use them as mesh relay nodes ?<br>
><br>
<br>
Or as the basis for school servers or simpler content storage servers maybe?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Christoph<br>
<br>
--<br>
Christoph Derndorfer<br>
<br>
volunteer, OLPC (Austria) [<a href="http://www.olpc.at" target="_blank">www.olpc.at</a>]<br>
editor, OLPC News [<a href="http://www.olpcnews.com" target="_blank">www.olpcnews.com</a>]<br>
contributor, TechnikBasteln [<a href="http://www.technikbasteln.net" target="_blank">www.technikbasteln.net</a>]<br>
<br>
e-mail: <a href="mailto:christoph@derndorfer.eu">christoph@derndorfer.eu</a><br>
</div></div></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Christoph Derndorfer<div><br></div><div><div>volunteer, OLPC (Austria) [<a href="http://www.olpc.at/" target="_blank">www.olpc.at</a>]<br><div>editor, OLPC News [<a href="http://www.olpcnews.com/" target="_blank">www.olpcnews.com</a>]<br>
contributor, TechnikBasteln [<a href="http://www.technikbasteln.net/" target="_blank">www.technikbasteln.net</a>]</div></div><div><br></div><div>e-mail: <a href="mailto:christoph@derndorfer.eu" target="_blank">christoph@derndorfer.eu</a></div>
<div><br></div></div><br>
</div>