On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <<a href="mailto:bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu">bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">
John Watlington wrote:<br>
| On May 22, 2008, at 11:01 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:<br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">|> GPS enables a lot of mapping and geography-related educational<br>
|> activities, which is why it was originally considered for the XO-1.<br>
|> It would probably (like the camera) only be powered on when being used<br>
|> (although the long lock-on time might make this user-unfriendly).<br>
<br>
</div>Long lock-on times have been reduced considerably in the latest generation<br>
of cheap GPS hardware. Initializing with a good guess makes it even<br>
faster, just a few seconds.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"></div></blockquote><div><br>Yes.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
|> Google Earth-like applications are fantastic for giving students a<br>
|> sense of their place on the earth, and there's a lot of economic<br>
|> possibility inherent in allowing kids to create better maps for their<br>
|> local neighborhoods. But, the time/cost was not ripe for Gen 1, and<br>
|> it may not be for Gen 2 either.<br>
|<br>
| Probably not. Remember the accusations that we already<br>
| HAVE a GPS unit in the XO, and are using it to track everybody...<br>
| Would we have to have a hardware-only light that indicates that<br>
| the GPS unit has been used to locate the laptop ?<br>
<br>
</div>A hardware light sounds like a good idea to me. Nonetheless, we should<br>
not allow the conspiracy theorists to design our hardware. We are of<br>
course speaking about GPS receivers, not location transponders. OLPC may<br>
not be able to include GPS, but we should not deny useful technologies to<br>
children merely because we expect a backlash from uninformed armchair critics.<br>
<br>
- --Ben</blockquote><div><br>Ben is spot on. Wad, I'm surprised you are so worried about that... of course including a good location transponder would be a /real/ power drain.<br><br>If we are worried about transparency of 'location', we should have a visible indicator every time an XO calls home over the network -- this is something I actually really want to see, and significantly more relevant than a gps hardware light would be.<br>
<br>SJ<br></div></div>