Hi Javier, (and everyone else)<br><br>The proposed procedure doesn't detail how the mpp detection should work (which is to mean that currently it is supposed to use the customized udp package). It only specifies the order of each step, and which possible connectivity scenarios may arise.
<br><br>In that respect, I would suggest to change the order of the dhcp and mpp queries, so as to finish in less time: (I am taking the time brackets written on the whiteboard, so it may be inaccurate)<br><br>Every DHCP attempt takes around 30s, while the assignation of a IPv4LL address + MPP discovery only take around 11s. It would be possible to incorporate some kind of flag to the reply message, to specify if the mpp contacted is a school server.*
<br>This would reduce the elapse time per failed attempt by 19s, without making any changes to the rest of the diagramm.<br><br><br>Then there is the issue of changing from the current mpp discovery protocol to a 'more standard' way of doing it; but appart from 'standardisation' (and showing anyone with dns-sd capabilities the presence of the server), I cannot say what the advantages would be
<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Miguel<br><br>* If there is a school server present, we can suppose that no other node on the mesh has mpp status<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/2/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Javier Cardona
</b> <<a href="mailto:javier@cozybit.com">javier@cozybit.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi John, Dan,
<br><br>> 1. The XO finds an established MPP (w. DHCP), and uses it for<br>> internet access.<br>> 2. The XO finds an AP, and becomes an ad-hoc MPP (no DHCP)<br>> 3. The XO finds an ad-hoc MPP (no DHCP), and uses it for internet access
<br>> 4. The XO finds no AP nor MPP, and becomes a mesh node on channel 1<br>> w. no internet access<br><br>Some questions...<br><br>1. Is this algorithm using the MPP anycast address to discover the best MPP?<br>2. Is DHCP replacing the non-standard MPP requests used by mpp-utils?
<br><br>I was contacted a while ago by Miguel Alvarez (<a href="mailto:miguel@laptop.org">miguel@laptop.org</a>) who<br>is looking for a more "standards compliant" mechanism to configure<br>MPs. He suggested to replace the custom mppreqs with DNS-SD. Has he
<br>been part of these discussions?<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Javier<br><br>--<br>Javier Cardona<br>cozybit Inc.<br>p 415 974 6770<br>f 415 974 6771<br>c 415 630 0627<br>e <a href="mailto:javier@cozybit.com">javier@cozybit.com
</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Devel@laptop.org">Devel@laptop.org</a><br><a href="http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel">http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>violence is the last refuge of the incompetent<br>--isaac asimov