Policy for non-responsive maintainers

[Bernie Innocenti]

Is this a good time to re-spin the discussion? Considering that it keeps
coming up:

<lionaneesh-andro> bernie: Could you help me takeover maintainership of an inactive activity?
<bernie> lionaneesh-andro: ask alsroot, he maintains aslo
* alsroot only maintains aslo, dirakx was taking care about aslo content
<bernie> lionaneesh-andro: gonzalo_odiard and garycmartin are the activity team coordinators.
<bernie> lionaneesh-andro: there's currently no written process for taking over an unmaintained activity. maybe ask them for permission first?
<bernie> lionaneesh-andro: please, write to sugar-devel@ and cc me, alsroot, gonzalo and gary.
<lionaneesh-andro> bernie: okay. Thanks.

On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 19:04 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 14:27 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > If you are not in a hurry to get this discussed,
> > I propose wait until we finish we 0.98 (one month aprox)
> > Right now, all the people we want be involved in this discussion,
> > are too busy (me too).
> 
> There's no particular hurry.
> 
> Actually, I brought up this particular issue just to make a more general
> point: we should codify our existing practices in the wiki for the
> benefit of new and existing contributors. Being swamped by an unclear
> process can be quite frustrating for a volunteer who just wants to get
> things done.
> 
> 
> > About the  summer young hackaton in Uruguay, I take your word.
> 
> Glad to help, although it's unlikely that I'll be able to join in.
> 

-- 
 _ // Bernie Innocenti
 \X/  http://codewiz.org