[Sugar-devel] How everyone can help with 0.100
Jerry Vonau
jvonau at shaw.ca
Fri Aug 16 23:21:05 EDT 2013
Adding in olpc-devel.
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported
> fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you should give it a try before
> settling on a plan.
>
> * webkitgtk
>
>
>
> which drags in
>
>
> libsoup
> glib
> gobject-introspection
> pygobject
> dbus-python
>
Kind of need to know the exact versions of the above packages, olpc is
carrying patched versions[1] of a couple of those packages, so we need
to be careful here. Anybody want to chime in on what patches need to be
present for the XOs?
* gwebsockets
What are its dependencies?
> * libxklavier (not needed on the XO according to Jerry).
>
See for yourself[2], olpc doesn't ship sugar-cp-keyboard.
Jerry
1.http://mock.laptop.org/cgit/local.13.2.0/tree/SRPMS
2.http://download.laptop.org/xo-4/os/official/13.2.0-13/32013o4.packages.txt
>
> The first group of dependencies are probably going to be quite a pain.
> So you might want to patch webactivity.py to support webkit1 instead.
>
> That would leave only gwebsockets. Add sugar, sugar-toolkit-gtk3,
> sugar-datastore, sugar-artwork. A total of five packages, not too bad.
>
>
> On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Martin Abente wrote:
> I think that having these packages on a publicly available
> repo would be of great help, not only for testing but also for
> developing... I know that maintaining specs and a building
> system sounds like headache now... but what if we can split
> the work?
>
> Daniel, how many system packages (aprox) are we talking about?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Jerry Vonau <jvonau at shaw.ca>
> wrote:
> OLPC doesn't ship with cp-keyboard installed perhaps
> for testing on XOs
> we could just patch that out at rpm generation like
> OLPC had done in the
> past.
>
> Jerry
>
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 02:17 +0200, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in
> Fedora 19 but it's
> > required for the keyboard control panel section to
> work.
> >
> > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > >From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier
> 5.4, webkitgtk
> > 2.0.x. There are almost certainly more deps.
> (We really need
> > to start tracking our dependencies more
> systematically but
> > it's tricky).
> >
> > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200,
> Daniel Narvaez
> > wrote:
> > > It would be nice but I think it
> would involve a non
> > trivial amount of
> > > work to do it properly. It's not
> just rebuilding the
> > sugar rpms, there
> > > are system dependencies that would
> need to be
> > built... latest
> > > libxklavier and webkitgtk comes to
> my mind, but
> > there is probably
> > > more.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > What versions of the above packages
> and gwebsockets
> > are required?
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > >
> > > On 15 August 2013 05:12, Martin
> Abente
> > > <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > +1 This would be great!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at
> 8:42 PM, Gonzalo
> > Odiard
> > > <gonzalo at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> > > +1 to have rpms to
> install over
> > 13.2.0
> > > In this way we can
> isolate for other
> > changes on the
> > > distro,
> > > for every change
> in Fedora version,
> > there are broken
> > > pieces,
> > > we learned that...
> > >
> > >
> > > Gonzalo
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14,
> 2013 at 8:48 PM,
> > James Cameron
> > > <quozl at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> > > Yes, an
> image or a procedure
> > for retrofit of
> > > 13.2.0
> please.
> > >
> > > I think a
> retrofit might
> > provide for wider
> > > testing.
> A set of RPMs to
> > > download
> and install, then
> > reboot?
> > >
> > > On Wed,
> Aug 14, 2013 at
> > 03:28:14PM +0200,
> > > Daniel
> Narvaez wrote:
> > > > Being an
> OLPC list perhaps
> > it's better to
> > > wait we
> have a XO image
> > before
> > > > posting
> there?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 14
> August 2013 15:26,
> > Chris Leonard
> > >
> <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
More information about the Devel
mailing list