XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

[Yioryos Asprobounitis]

--- On Sat, 7/21/12, Richard A. Smith <richard at laptop.org> wrote:
> 
> Yes and I'll continue to say it as long as you continue to
> do things
> that are invalid and will produce nonsensical results. 
> I've told you a
> few times that when you run commands like bg-acr! that you
> are modifying
> important values outside of the EC and that until you do a
> full
> discharge/recharge cycle normal reporting won't yield valid
> results.
> 
I'm sorry but I did not run any  bg-acr! commands except the one you suggested.
The only command that I run outside your suggestions is bg-acr@ .bg-acr with no batman.fth/batman-start first, which certainly can not account for the erratic behavior.

You are certainly free to disregard whatever I say/describe, but can not justify it by "inappropriate commands", because they were not any. All the commands issued are described precisely.

I keep saying that the battery EC might have a problem and you just dismiss all the indications (like a full battery reporting as empty) including even the fact that EC reports the battery is asleep while the discharge data show that is not.

Oh well, I do not think that one battery in a couple of millions worths all this trouble.

Have a good trip.