12.1.0 devel build 6 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75
mikus at bga.com
Tue Apr 3 15:02:56 EDT 2012
> I don't disagree but ultimately if there's not appropriate bug reports
> with all the information needed we can't fix the problems. So
> ultimately I appreciate his bug reports but with a non standard
> configuration we need detailed reports to have that information be
> useful for those people that actually have to deal with the
> information and fix the problem.
I've already stopped writing bug reports against Fedora - I've concluded
their requirement that the submitter describe "how to reproduce the bug"
is to me not worth my time and effort. Fedora is *their* product - what
does it matter to me whether it retains bugs ?
You would like "all the information needed". I thought I posted to the
effect that when an XO-1 with 12.1.0 build os6 is booted, nothing gets
defined in the /dev tree against which a 'mount' command could be issued
in order to access the content of a partition on the SD card plugged
into the XO-1 external slot (beneath the screen). It is not clear to me
what the "we need detailed reports" are that would allow you to discover
whether such a problem exists on the XO-1 you use.
Note that for my purposes I was able to bypass this problem. What I was
not able to ignore was the os6 (on XO-1) reaction to having an entry in
/etc/fstab referencing this undefined (on os6) storage device. But I
agree that having such an entry in /etc/fstab is "non-standard" -- from
now on, I will make sure to NEVER for 12.1.0 to mention any problems I
have with whatever I do that is "non-standard".
More information about the Devel