[PATCH] Add libertas_disablemesh module parameter to disable mesh interface
sascha-ml-reply-to-2011-2 at silbe.org
Fri May 13 09:16:31 EDT 2011
Excerpts from Dan Williams's message of Thu May 12 05:11:36 +0200 2011:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:52 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> > This allows individual users and deployments to disable mesh support at
> > runtime, i.e. without having to build and maintain a custom kernel.
> Does the mesh interface somehow cause problems, even when nothing is
> using it?
Some people suspect it does, but there's no hard data showing that. But
then the problems are often hard to reproduce in the first place, so
proving a correlation with mesh is even harder.
The hardware based mesh support is based on an outdated draft of
802.11s and not interoperable with any other device AFAIK. For most
users Ad-hoc networks are the better option. Disabling mesh support as
low-level as possible makes it less likely that any remains are causing
trouble. With at least four layers (firmware, kernel, NM, Sugar)
involved in managing connectivity and one of the (firmware) being closed
source, I prefer to simplify things by eliminating three layers for
functionality we don't intend to use. It makes debugging (and
blaming ;) ) a lot easier.
In the field, mesh support is currently disabled using
/sys/class/net/eth0/lbs_mesh. However, it comes back after resume
(possibly only if powercycled) and needs to be disabled again by
post-resume hacks. Race conditions with NM are possible.
A user space option would be to teach NM to disable mesh support (at
runtime - we don't want to ship a custom NM package). I'd expect the
patch to be much more invasive than the one posted for libertas.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 494 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Devel