WebM format for Record

Tiago Marques tiagomnm at gmail.com
Mon Jun 6 21:57:00 EDT 2011

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton at gmail.com>wrote:

> >
> > Oh and there was a question about backwards compatibility.  I know
> > there would be work testing it, but I see no problems with backward
> > compatibility.  We would just have to check file types and adjust the
> > pipeline accordingly.  We would also have to adjust the mimetype
> > properties to any Activities that may hard code them.
> >
> A quick follow up.  I decided to do a general shoot out for Record and the
> different codecs.  Here is an html5 page that shows all three codecs.
> Upper Left is default Record.  CPU utilization was around 95% on average.
> Upper Right is webm Record   CPU utilization was around 75% on average
> Lower Left is theora 1.2.0alpha1.  CPU Utilization was around 95% on
> average.
> This is with no changes to the pipelines.  I just wanted a quick reference.
This is XO-1.5?


>  Jon
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110607/fb46f53a/attachment.html>

More information about the Devel mailing list