udev rules for wedo
Jerry Vonau
jvonau at shaw.ca
Thu Jul 14 14:47:44 EDT 2011
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 13:21 -0500, Rafael Ortiz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org> wrote:
> jerry wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > Playing around with wedo, I've found that scratch is
> providing udev
> > rules for wedo and there are rules installed by olpc-utils.
> I'm
> > wondering if the rules provided by scratch should be used
> in place of or
> > in conjunction with the olpc provided rules
> in /etc/udev/rules.d. Here
> > are the contents of the 2 files for F11.
> >
> > 30-olpc-wedo.rules:
> > # Lego WeDo
> > SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0003",
> GROUP="dialout",
> > MODE="0660"
> >
> > 45-lego-wedo.rules:
> > # Lego WeDo
> > SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0003",
> MODE="0666"
> >
> > Looks to me that what is provided by scratch should be part
> of
> > olpc-utils.
>
>
> i believe scratch supplies rules because (at least at the
> time) it
> could be installed on XO distributions that didn't include
> udev
> rules at all.
>
> This is my impresion too, last versions of scratch included these
> rules.
>
Ok, then I'll assume those are included to allow scratch to work on
something other than an olpc build.
>
> and since the 'olpc' user is a member of group 'dialout', i
> think these
> rules are equivalent in practice. (except for use by 'other',
> and i'm not sure how that would happen on an XO.) both rules
> give the olpc user read/write access to the device.
>
> are you seeing a conflict or other problem?
>
I don't have a wedo kit yet to test with, I'm just trying to preempt any
issues.
Jerry
More information about the Devel
mailing list