[support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
garycmartin at googlemail.com
Sun Jul 10 22:23:00 EDT 2011
I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning.
On 10 Jul 2011, at 23:45, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 05:42 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
>> This is a vote to determine the suggested license for future releases
>> of Sugar. This poll will run from right now until Wed Jun 29 2011 at
>> midnight UTC-4.
> Sorry for the late update; the reporting mechanism for our voting
> software temporarily broke.
> Summary: the winner was **GNU GPL version 3, or any later version**.
> ## Results Details ##
> 55 out of 217 eligible members voted, or a little more than ¼.
> The full results of this election ranked the candidates in order of
> preference (from most preferred to least preferred):
> 1. GNU GPL version 3, or any later version
> 2. GNU GPL version 2, or any later version
> 3. Don't know or don't care
> Each number in the table below shows how many times the candidate on the
> left beat the matching candidate on the top. The winner is on the top of
> the left column.
> v3 v2 DC
> v3 -- 34 37
> v2 21 -- 42
> DC 18 13 --
> Based on a sheer count of 1st place votes, v3 received 49% of the vote,
> v2 received 29% of the vote, and the apathetic position received the
> remaining 22% of the vote.
> Full details (and alternative election method calculations) are visible
> at the Selectricity page linked in the original voting ticket email.
> Luke Faraone
> Sugar Labs, Systems
> ✉: luke at sugarlabs.org
> I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net
> support-gang mailing list
> support-gang at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Devel