F14 os2 testing images available for XO-1 and XO-1.5
quozl at laptop.org
Mon Nov 22 05:55:59 EST 2010
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:03:28AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> I think we should add a Version field for F14 (e.g. 1.5/1.0 software
> Build F14).
I disagree. The version field is for formal releases. The reporter of
a bug may use "Development build as of this date" for the current F14
builds. Identify the build version in the keywords field. This has
been our practice for the past year.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:36:03AM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
> You could even simplify it a step further: just put all of them in the
> F14 milestone without thought. As the scope of the release is not yet
> defined it's not really possible to do a "real" triage. And knowing
> what bugs are there could also help us define that scope.
I agree, just throw them into the F14 milestone.
trac does not allow us to easily manage tickets for multiple release
engineering streams. If you sense a fight over which milestone a ticket
should be in (10.1.3 vs F14), then I suggest opening a new ticket.
More information about the Devel