Adobe Flash 10.1 + AIR 2.0 on the XO
wad at laptop.org
Thu Mar 25 16:50:07 EDT 2010
On Mar 25, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Carlos Nazareno <object404 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh dear. Googling HQTube ended up with the top 2 entries being porn
> sites :-/ I think something needs a project name change :)
> Indeed, hence the link in my e-mail, to avoid confusion.
> Anyway, wouldn't there be a problem if we bundled HQTube because
> VLC/Xine/MPlayer would still need licensed codecs to be able to decode
> audio/video streams? (FFmpeg/Gstreamer Ugly). In the case of Flash, at
> least we'd have working sound because it's all good and licensed,
> unlike in the default GNASH install.
> I don't think H.264 needs licensed codecs but I'm not sure on that
EVERY codec need licenses. I know that the FOSS community
thinks that Theora is unencumbered, but it has never been tested
in court (there hasn't ever been anybody worth suing using it.)
This becomes a real problem when we start asking hardware
vendors to provide firmware supporting these "free" codecs.
If they provide them, they then become a choice target for an
In past jobs I've purchased codecs, and a large part of what is
being purchased is indemnity against infringement lawsuits.
It sucks, but flame your local federal rep., not me, and contribute
heavily to the EFF.
More information about the Devel