[SoaS] [IAEP] Attention Activity Developers: SoaS Activity Inclusion Criteria

Carlo Falciola cfalciola at yahoo.it
Tue Jun 8 03:18:17 EDT 2010



--- Mar 8/6/10, Sameer Verma <sverma at sfsu.edu> ha scritto:

> Da: Sameer Verma <sverma at sfsu.edu>
> Oggetto: Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] Attention Activity Developers: SoaS Activity Inclusion Criteria
> A: "Sebastian Dziallas" <sebastian at when.com>
> Cc: "Devel" <devel at lists.laptop.org>, "iaep" <iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>, "Sugar devel" <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>, "Sugar on a Stick List" <soas at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Data: Martedì 8 giugno 2010, 07:29
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:54 PM,
> Sebastian Dziallas <sebastian at when.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the
> SoaS Activity
> > Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki to the
> activity
> > selection for the upcoming release of SoaS v.4. We'd
> like to encourage
> > you to work towards meeting these goals and to submit
> your proposals
> > for activities and further features following the
> feature process [3]
> > according to the release schedule [4]. The final
> deadline to have
> > features *approved* (please submit your proposals well
> in advance) is
> > July 27.
> >
> > We're especially lead to this step to ensure to
> continued stability of
> > future Sugar on a Stick releases and look forward to
> working with you!
> > Please email the SoaS list or our release team with
> any concerns.
> >
> > --Sebastian Dziallas
> >
> > [1] http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100607_1510.html
> > [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/SoaS_Activity_Criteria
> > [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick_release_process#Feature_process
> > [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick#Release_schedule
> > _______________________________________________
> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop
> project!)
> > IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> >
> 
> The criteria page lists attributes that are either yes or
> no (binary).
> I had suggested a weighted scoring approach way back for
> G1G1
> activities. Here's that thread.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/olpc-open@lists.laptop.org/msg00641.html
> The idea is to score each attribute on a more granular
> scale than 0/1
> and then weight each attribute based on importance for a
> particular
> implementation.
> 
> cheers,
> Sameer


+1

ciao carlo


> -- 
> Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor, Information Systems
> Director, Campus Business Solutions
> San Francisco State University
> http://verma.sfsu.edu/
> http://opensource.sfsu.edu/
> http://cbs.sfsu.edu/
> http://is.sfsu.edu/
> _______________________________________________
> SoaS mailing list
> SoaS at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
> 


      




More information about the Devel mailing list