[Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS
walter.bender at gmail.com
Thu Jul 15 20:27:35 EDT 2010
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <godiard at gmail.com> wrote:
> May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys
> (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other
> uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys
> to enlarge or reduce the brush, the fonts,etc.
> If we need F5 and F6 to the journal and the frame we can use F7 and F8 to
> change sizes but will be different in the actual keyboards and the HS
> You will have other problem with the actual keyboard definition.Pressing fn
> with any slider key gives no event at all.
This is a regression. It used to (2007) return keycodes.
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
>> On the XO HS (highschool edition, the one with a more "normal"
>> keyboard) we're facing some questions about how the F keys should
>> function, under sugar and GNOME.
>> The technicalities are in http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10213 and here
>> is a picture of the keyboard:
>> Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in
>> agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should
>> press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness).
>> This matches behaviour of "normal" laptops, including the Dell that
>> I'm writing on. Linux already has mechanisms (once through hal, now
>> through udev) so that when I press Fn+F8 on my Dell, X receives the
>> "volume down" key press (instead of the Fn+F8 key press), matching
>> what is printed on the keyboard.
>> We want all of the unmodified F-keys to send the normal F-key events
>> (we don't want to map them especially). This is for maximum
>> compatibility with non-sugar environments.
>> For Sugar we have an open question.
>> The F1-F4 keys have the zoom levels printed on them, and pressing the
>> keys unmodified will cause the zoom levels to change (because this is
>> how Sugar is already coded, it responds to the literal F1 keypress).
>> The other keys are:
>> - F5: search/journal
>> - F6: frame
>> - F9: brightness down
>> - F10: brightness up
>> - F11: volume down
>> - F12: volume up
>> For these other keys, when using Sugar, should the user have to press
>> the Fn modifier while pressing the key in order to reach the named
>> The advantage of not having to press Fn (i.e. the keys would work
>> unmodified) is that sugar works the way it always has on XO (we retain
>> consistency with XO-1).
>> As for the other option, the advantage of requiring Fn is that we gain
>> consistency between Sugar and GNOME, and between the XO HS and
>> "normal" laptops (where Fn *is* necessary to reach those alternate
>> functions). (but we do end up with some confusion with the zoom level
>> keys,which will continue to work unmodified)
>> If we decide to make the keys available unmodified in Sugar we would
>> have to change sugar (worldwide, not interested in downstream forked
>> patches) so that F5 on any system opens the journal, F6 on any system
>> opens the frame, etc. How would people feel about that?
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Devel