Filesystem in F11 builds

[Esteban Bordon]

Can this happen because the option versioned_fs=0 under base section?

Reading the README file of base module I found this text:

[base] options:

- versioned_fs (default 1)
Set to 0 to disable the "upgradeable" /versions-based filesystem layout.


2010/7/19 Esteban Bordon <ebordon at plan.ceibal.edu.uy>

> I checked /proc/mounts in a XO with build 260py and is equal to this.
>
> I'm downloading os301 to test it.
>
> rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
> /proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0
> /sys /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
> udev /dev tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755 0 0
> /dev/pts /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620 0 0
> /dev/mtdblock0 / jffs2 rw,noatime 0 0
> udev /dev tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755 0 0
> /proc/bus/usb /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw,relatime 0 0
> none /var/lib/stateless/writable tmpfs
> rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/cache/man tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/lib/xkb tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/lock tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/log tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/run tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/lib/nfs tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /tmp tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/lib/dhclient tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/tmp tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /media tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /etc/adjtime tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /etc/lvm/archive tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /etc/lvm/backup tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/account tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> none /var/lib/logrotate.status tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024
> 0 0
> none /var/lib/random-seed tmpfs rw,relatime,size=1024k,nr_inodes=1024 0 0
> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,relatime,size=11108k 0 0
> /tmp /tmp tmpfs rw,relatime,size=11108k 0 0
> varcacheyum /var/cache/yum tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755 0 0
> vartmp /var/tmp tmpfs rw,relatime,size=11108k 0 0
> varlog /var/log tmpfs rw,relatime,size=4444k 0 0
> none /ofw promfs rw,relatime 0 0
> none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,relatime 0 0
> gvfs-fuse-daemon /home/olpc/.gvfs fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon
> rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=500,group_id=500 0 0
> /dev/sda1 /media/367C-1F06 vfat
> rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,uid=500,gid=500,fmask=0022,dmask=0077,codepage=cp437,iocharset=ascii,utf8,flush,errors=remount-ro
> 0 0
>
>
>
> Esteban Bordón
> Investigación y Desarrollo - Plan Ceibal
> CITS - Av. Italia 6201 - Montevideo, Uruguay
> C.P. 11500
> Tel: (598 2) 601 5773 int. 2228
> Email: ebordon at plan.ceibal.edu.uy
>
>
> 2010/7/16 Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org>
>
> On 16 July 2010 12:29, Esteban Bordon <ebordon at plan.ceibal.edu.uy> wrote:
>> > Hi all!
>> > I'm working on F11-XO1 build to Uruguay and I made a dracut module that
>> it
>> > mount user's home in the sd card. I'm using olpc-os-builder-1.1.0 and
>> > resultant image filesystem haven't got the structure specified
>> > in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Zamora_Teran/olpc-update.
>> > If I look /proc/mounts the partition /home /versions and /security
>> doesn't
>> > exists.
>> > This can be for some error in the process?
>>
>> Are you sure?
>> Can you post the entire contents of /proc/mounts so that we can look?
>>
>> Using 10.1.2 build 301 for XO-1, these partitions are definitely
>> there. It's possible that your customizations are breaking this.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100719/7c466e07/attachment.html>