Which one is the latest signed image for 1.5? os64? os20x?

Martin Langhoff martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 20:53:47 EST 2010


Hi Chris,

few days ago I understood that the os20x images were the signed ones,
so I thought the official signed image would be os201 because you
wrote

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org> wrote:
> os200 is a signed os108, and os201 is a signed os109 minus the Fedora
> 11 updates packages that were new to os109.

But today I look at http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/official/ and
I see os64.

Are things slightly out of sync and os201 should be there? Are we
signing non-release images?

What we're trying to do right now is to test lease removal and,
re-activation with a 1.5. This of course needs a signed image, with a
known-good initramfs... other things are optional for this specific
exercise...

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff at gmail.com
 martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff


More information about the Devel mailing list