[PATCH 1/3] olpc-battery: add support for CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN

[Andres Salomon]

On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:41:20 +0000
David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 16:38 -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > It there is, it's not at all clear.  The values are fetched from the
> > EC, which get them from the EEPROM. 
> 
> If the EC knows them, can't we ask the EC rather than pulling numbers
> our of our arse in the kernel?

Sorry, i meant the battery manufacturer/type info is fetched from the
EC (and the DT doesn't appear to have *that* information, much less
the magic values that this patch uses).

Pgf or Richard can probably tell us if the magic numbers can be derived
from the EC.