git help needed for 2.6.34 kernel branch revival
pgf at laptop.org
Tue Aug 17 17:26:35 EDT 2010
> On 17 August 2010 15:08, Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org> wrote:
> > would it work better to merge each of the the -stable kernels
> > in turn? because then you'd probably get the undo of the -stable
> > change along with the mainline change that supercedes it. but that
> > might not work, and it would be a lot of merges.
> Not sure what you mean. Can you give a more specific example?
> Do you mean UNmerge the 2.6.31-stable kernels?
> (6 were already merged...)
i probably don't understand the problem well enough. i was
thinking that merging in the rest of the -stable kernels (and
there would be a lot of them, from 126.96.36.199 to 2.6.34.N) would
get you closer, in a more automated way. the more i think about
it the more doubtful i am.
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Devel